By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Stay Current on Political News—The US FutureStay Current on Political News—The US FutureStay Current on Political News—The US Future
  • Home
  • USA
  • World
  • Business
    • Realtor
    • CEO
    • Founder
    • Entrepreneur
    • Journalist
  • Sports
    • Athlete
    • Coach
    • Fitness trainer
    • Life Style
  • Education
  • Health
    • Doctor
    • Plastic surgeon
    • Beauty cosmetics
  • Politics
  • Technology
    • Space
    • Cryptocurrency
  • Weather
Reading: UK Regulator Rules on La Roche-Posay Over “No.1 Dermatologist Recommended” Claim
Share
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Stay Current on Political News—The US FutureStay Current on Political News—The US Future
  • Home
  • USA
  • World
  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economy
  • Life Style
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Space
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Weather
  • Entertainment
  • Cybersecurity
Search
  • Home
  • USA
  • World
  • Business
    • Realtor
    • CEO
    • Founder
    • Entrepreneur
    • Journalist
  • Sports
    • Athlete
    • Coach
    • Fitness trainer
    • Life Style
  • Education
  • Health
    • Doctor
    • Plastic surgeon
    • Beauty cosmetics
  • Politics
  • Technology
    • Space
    • Cryptocurrency
  • Weather
Follow US
Stay Current on Political News—The US Future > Blog > Beauty cosmetics > UK Regulator Rules on La Roche-Posay Over “No.1 Dermatologist Recommended” Claim
Beauty cosmetics

UK Regulator Rules on La Roche-Posay Over “No.1 Dermatologist Recommended” Claim

Robert Hughes
Robert Hughes
Published September 19, 2025
Share

The fact that? The United Kingdom Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) investigated three issues related to a list of Roche-Posay products after a Beeriersdorf UK LTD challenge, defending one and rejecting two.

The details The case referred to an announcement of the December site 2024 for the MELA B3 cleaner of the Roche-Posay. Beiersdorf UK LTD challenged Wheter’s claims, including “a new mode of action as never before” and “dermatologist No.1 Edommende Brand in the United Kingdom” were misleading and capable of justifying. The ASA discovered that the claim of the “new mode of action” was backed by evidence that showed that active mellyl worked differently to existing hyperpigmentation treatments, and accepted the justification of the claim “No.1” based on surveys of dermatologists in the United Kingdom. However, the regulator confirmed a complaint about verifiability, ruling that the announcement could not sign clearly where consumers could verify the basic claim of “No.1”. The announcement should not appear again in its current form, and future communications must be clearer for comparative claims.

Why? The ruling emphasizes that beauty advertisers should not only corroborate comparative claims, but also ensure that they are easily verifiable to avoid violating the advertising codes of the United Kingdom.

Fountain: Handle

Popular News
World

Princess of Wales pulls out of Royal Ascot

Robert Hughes
Robert Hughes
June 21, 2025
Ethereum Treasury Demand Slips 80% as ETH Price Reclaims $3K
Sarah Palin Loses Defamation Suit Retrial Against New York Times
Penguin–The Flightless Bird of Health AI – The Health Care Blog
CBSE Class 12 results declared: Girls lead the way yet again
Stay Current on Political News—The US Future
The USA Future offers real-time updates, expert analysis, and breaking stories on U.S. politics, culture, and current events.
  • USA
  • World
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Weather
  • Business
  • Entrepreneur
  • Founder
  • Journalist
  • Realtor
  • Health
  • Doctor
  • Beauty cosmetics
  • Plastic surgeon
  • Sports
  • Athlete
  • Coach
  • Fitness trainer
© 2017-2026 The USA Future . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?