Opinion of: Gracy Chen, CEO, Bitget
Cryptographic merchants are drowning in information. Live prices flash by the microsecond, the ping wallet trackers move and the feeling in x pivots per minute. For the average retail investor, keeping up to date means decoding all this through level PRO panels after blocking full -time work. That is the real pressure point that forms Cryptos of the next evolution: not another institutional product such as Blackrock’s ETH Strike application.
Commercial agents of the sacrifice a practical solution to that challenge. They compress the flood of market data in a unique and processable recommendation that only needs a simple user entry. Let’s say someone establishes the instructions: “Block the profits if BTC falls 5% while I am axle.” The AI Agent throws the trigger for them and hides again before the user’s alarm sounds.
Although recent initiatives of the heavyweights of Wall Street such as Blackrock and Standard Chartered provide a welcome validation for cryptography markets, their role is largely infrastructural, which helps money to enter and leave. What will really keep committed users are AI agents that make them maintain in the market is easier, emarter and more sustainable.
Institutions pursue access, merchants yearn intelligence
The rails are quickly becoming a merchandise. JPMorgan’s electronic commerce edition surveyed 4,200 purchase and sale merchants: 61% said AI will influence markets more than any other technology in the next three years more than the integration of API, rather than blockchain.
The retail side tells the same story. One in seven cryptography users is happy to deliver its entire portfolio to an algorithm. Participants want systems that detect patterns before humans flash.
Attention as a scarce asset
Drawing a clear line between AI agents and commercial bots is important here. Commerce bots still dominate orders books, eliminate grid or impulse scripts. They are automated, but they are not intelligent.
IA agents operate differently. They rewrite their play books in real time, combining scores of feelings, wallet forensics and personal risk budgets.
A merchant can go from simple “purchase/sale” orders to detailed supplies such as “reduce my risk exposure portfolios during the next month” or “identify narrative rotations in early stages in memecoins.” The agent then synthesizes the market data to recalibrate the strategy on the march.
The restless compensation between autonomy and responsibility
Some critics argue that delegating the execution to users of agency software and could magnify tail risk events if multiple agents pursue the same signal simultaneously.
Others warn that Blackbox’s decision -making will collide with the rules of fortuitous on algorithmic responsibility. The adjustment cycles show that the productivity gains won once the safeguards such as circuit switches, kill change permits and transparent audit records are integrated.
The exchanges that lack agents orchestration within next year, the risk of seeing volumes migrates to platforms where trade feels as easy as Spotify recommendations. Venture Capital and M&A will probably flood the infrastructure of the agents, compressing click rates for performing and rewarding markets that expose the APIs friendly to the agents.
Related: Money never sleeps, and Wall Street is waking up
As IA agents begin to trade on different platforms in a secondary fraction, more activity will change to exchanges that can keep up with that speed. The markets of market manufacturers will harden, and pricing discovery could accelerate until the human reaction time becomes irrelevant.
Institutional desks will not be exempt. After the agents can test determinist records, the treasurers will enrut the flow towards the place of Whicever offers the lowest “latency to insight” pipe. In Equits, Latency Wars amended Exchange League tables; Intelligence latency will do the same in cryptography.
It is unlikely that legislators prohibit the trade of agents more than prohibited algorithmic actions. Instead, they will require verifiable audit trails for each inference and action.
The platforms that bake the cryptographic registration in their agents frames will convert compliance with a headache into a pit.
Exchanges have two options
The imminent contest is not banking versus exchange. From the user’s perspective, it is “equipment” versus “overporm”. Platforms that incorporate personal commercial agents will open professional grade strategies, even if others handle their Fiat on-Disaster.
The industry must stop sending shipping panels created for Bloomberg terminals and start throwing co -altogers that listen, learn and act for the benefit of everyday users. Putting that battery requires real -time data ingeion, tight language models and governance layers that allow humans to establish Guardraails without passing over each decision.
Regulated access can open the door, but agentive execution decides who walks and is waiting outside.
Opinion of: Gracy Chen, CEO, Bitget.
This article is for general information purposes and does not intend to be and should not be tasks such as legal or investment advice. The views, the thoughts and opinions expressed here are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the opinions and opinions of Cointelegraph.
