By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Stay Current on Political News—The US FutureStay Current on Political News—The US FutureStay Current on Political News—The US Future
  • Home
  • USA
  • World
  • Business
    • Realtor
    • CEO
    • Founder
    • Entrepreneur
    • Journalist
  • Sports
    • Athlete
    • Coach
    • Fitness trainer
    • Life Style
  • Education
  • Health
    • Doctor
    • Plastic surgeon
    • Beauty cosmetics
  • Politics
  • Technology
    • Space
    • Cryptocurrency
  • Weather
Reading: Many of Us Oppose Fixing ‘Wide Open’ Asylum Laws Unless We Get Protections for Illegals
Share
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Stay Current on Political News—The US FutureStay Current on Political News—The US Future
  • Home
  • USA
  • World
  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economy
  • Life Style
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Space
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Weather
  • Entertainment
  • Cybersecurity
Search
  • Home
  • USA
  • World
  • Business
    • Realtor
    • CEO
    • Founder
    • Entrepreneur
    • Journalist
  • Sports
    • Athlete
    • Coach
    • Fitness trainer
    • Life Style
  • Education
  • Health
    • Doctor
    • Plastic surgeon
    • Beauty cosmetics
  • Politics
  • Technology
    • Space
    • Cryptocurrency
  • Weather
Follow US
Stay Current on Political News—The US Future > Blog > USA > Many of Us Oppose Fixing ‘Wide Open’ Asylum Laws Unless We Get Protections for Illegals
USA

Many of Us Oppose Fixing ‘Wide Open’ Asylum Laws Unless We Get Protections for Illegals

Sophia Martin
Sophia Martin
Published April 25, 2025
Share

In the transmission of Thursday or Newsnations “Cuomo”, representative Adam Smith (D-WA) ceded to strengthen the asylum laws that were “open” is something that many Democrats would make their own fear that they obtain protections for people in the country illegally.

After Smith talked about preparing an integral agreement and said that “asylum laws were open, and people have an advantage of that.” Host Chris Cuomo asked: “[B]UT Why does that child or commitment have to be? Because the idea of ​​doing integral has become a son of the rule. Because? Why not break it separately? Why not change asylum standards to recognize the reality that economic anguish is not asylum, not under the 1980 solution that Reagan did for the international treaty, not under anyone’s law? That is why 90% of cases, you lose. Why not solve that as independent? “

Smith replied: “I would agree to do that. Many of my fellow Democrats would not do it. And I am not indifferent, because they are what they are, you will never address the problem or refugees of Opocumented Popmate, for people with temporary temporary [Protected Status] -. “

Then, Cuomo cut the Democrats when they controlled Congress and the White House under President Barack Obama, and Smith replied that it is not a clear consensus in Congress.

Continue Ian Hanchett on Twitter @Ianhanchett

Popular News
USA

NYC pols attend downtown gathering for Rising Tide Effect

Sophia Martin
Sophia Martin
April 19, 2025
Private companies added 155,000 jobs in March, more than expected, ADP says
Brooke Shields celebrates daughter Grier’s 19th birthday with rare throwback photos
The IRS Confiscates More from U.S. Taxpayers Than the GDP of Almost Every Country in the World
Alleged Israeli LockBit Developer Rostislav Panev Extradited to U.S. for Cybercrime Charges
Stay Current on Political News—The US Future
The USA Future offers real-time updates, expert analysis, and breaking stories on U.S. politics, culture, and current events.
  • USA
  • World
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Weather
  • Business
  • Entrepreneur
  • Founder
  • Journalist
  • Realtor
  • Health
  • Doctor
  • Beauty cosmetics
  • Plastic surgeon
  • Sports
  • Athlete
  • Coach
  • Fitness trainer
© 2017-2025 The USA Future . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?