By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Stay Current on Political News—The US FutureStay Current on Political News—The US FutureStay Current on Political News—The US Future
  • Home
  • USA
  • World
  • Business
    • Realtor
    • CEO
    • Founder
    • Entrepreneur
    • Journalist
  • Sports
    • Athlete
    • Coach
    • Fitness trainer
    • Life Style
  • Education
  • Health
    • Doctor
    • Plastic surgeon
    • Beauty cosmetics
  • Politics
  • Technology
    • Space
    • Cryptocurrency
  • Weather
Reading: Many of Us Oppose Fixing ‘Wide Open’ Asylum Laws Unless We Get Protections for Illegals
Share
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Stay Current on Political News—The US FutureStay Current on Political News—The US Future
  • Home
  • USA
  • World
  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economy
  • Life Style
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Space
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Weather
  • Entertainment
  • Cybersecurity
Search
  • Home
  • USA
  • World
  • Business
    • Realtor
    • CEO
    • Founder
    • Entrepreneur
    • Journalist
  • Sports
    • Athlete
    • Coach
    • Fitness trainer
    • Life Style
  • Education
  • Health
    • Doctor
    • Plastic surgeon
    • Beauty cosmetics
  • Politics
  • Technology
    • Space
    • Cryptocurrency
  • Weather
Follow US
Stay Current on Political News—The US Future > Blog > USA > Many of Us Oppose Fixing ‘Wide Open’ Asylum Laws Unless We Get Protections for Illegals
USA

Many of Us Oppose Fixing ‘Wide Open’ Asylum Laws Unless We Get Protections for Illegals

Sophia Martin
Sophia Martin
Published April 25, 2025
Share

In the transmission of Thursday or Newsnations “Cuomo”, representative Adam Smith (D-WA) ceded to strengthen the asylum laws that were “open” is something that many Democrats would make their own fear that they obtain protections for people in the country illegally.

After Smith talked about preparing an integral agreement and said that “asylum laws were open, and people have an advantage of that.” Host Chris Cuomo asked: “[B]UT Why does that child or commitment have to be? Because the idea of ​​doing integral has become a son of the rule. Because? Why not break it separately? Why not change asylum standards to recognize the reality that economic anguish is not asylum, not under the 1980 solution that Reagan did for the international treaty, not under anyone’s law? That is why 90% of cases, you lose. Why not solve that as independent? “

Smith replied: “I would agree to do that. Many of my fellow Democrats would not do it. And I am not indifferent, because they are what they are, you will never address the problem or refugees of Opocumented Popmate, for people with temporary temporary [Protected Status] -. “

Then, Cuomo cut the Democrats when they controlled Congress and the White House under President Barack Obama, and Smith replied that it is not a clear consensus in Congress.

Continue Ian Hanchett on Twitter @Ianhanchett

Popular News
Entrepreneur

Travis Fox: The Emmy-Winning Visionary Transforming Confidence, Coaching, and Consciousness

admin
admin
April 6, 2025
Why You Should Start Strength Training Now — Not Later – MAXPRO Fitness
Leonard Wheeler: Redefining Leadership Through Empowerment, Vision, and Authenticity
13 best heat protectants we tested to shield and smooth hair
Lizard venom inspired Ozempic — as FDA warns of fake jabs
Stay Current on Political News—The US Future
The USA Future offers real-time updates, expert analysis, and breaking stories on U.S. politics, culture, and current events.
  • USA
  • World
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Weather
  • Business
  • Entrepreneur
  • Founder
  • Journalist
  • Realtor
  • Health
  • Doctor
  • Beauty cosmetics
  • Plastic surgeon
  • Sports
  • Athlete
  • Coach
  • Fitness trainer
© 2017-2026 The USA Future . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?